🔗 Share this article

In contemporary Britain, protest is no longer a fundamental right. Instead, it has become a privilege that authorities allow or deny at their discretion. This represents the underlying meaning of proposed measures that the ruling administration is putting forward, which would determine the timing and location protests can take place, with potential prison sentences for those who defy these restrictions.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Earlier governments had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the former Conservative government had granted law enforcement extensive additional powers, which global rights bodies had condemned as "significant and unjustified limitations" on democratic freedoms. Taken together, these incremental assaults on freedom have practically eliminated the historically earned right to freedom of protest.

Using Atrocity to Rationalize Crackdown

The latest restrictive measures are being justified by citing last week's heinous antisemitic attack on a Manchester mosque. There should be universal agreement that the safety of British Jews must be safeguarded. However, using this atrocity as a pretext to stifle dissent is not only disconnected to that responsibility but distorts it.

"When you can't set boundaries at genocide, you likely can't draw the line at democracy," observed a well-known American author, whose words that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Context of Protest

Consider Britain's rich history of protest and activism against racial discrimination and authoritarianism, from the historic 1936 Cable Street confrontation to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s demonstrations against the far-right organization. Many of these historical demonstrators were labeled as radicals in their time, even while they were fighting for the freedoms of minorities.

Current Reality

In the current complex situation, here's what's truly occurring: Israel – a sovereign nation – is committing acts that international bodies have characterized as genocide. Its military actions have led the International Criminal Court to issue legal indictments against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

Western popular sentiment has shifted dramatically against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of the public think Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would support a total prohibition on weapons exports to the state, and approve the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely lost the public debate, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a vile anti-Jewish attack to try to silence a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government seems involved in this effort. Government officials have not enacted extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to proceed.

People who are protesting against the erasure of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a important factor why there hasn't been a broader suppression on these protesters until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement little justification to intervene.

Problematic Association

Merging Jewish heritage with the policies of the government of Israel is not only cynical but also harmful. The official definition of anti-Jewish prejudice, adopted by the British government and many organizations, has been rightly challenged for potentially restricting legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be no disagreement about one of its central illustrations: that "making Jewish people collectively responsible for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes prejudice against Jews.

Escalating Restrictions

This is why we've reached a point where police authorities can propose that demonstrations criticizing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "accidentally or intentionally" endorse antisemitism. Similarly, political figures have declared that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "complicit" in supposed mistreatment experienced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the very day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed numerous of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the terrible count from two years of daily atrocities that have claimed many thousands of human lives. British political leaders and news organizations have barely concealed the minimal importance they attach to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen expressions of racism in our time.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already passed a dangerous boundary by banning a specific activist group, a non-violent, human rights-focused direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, primarily for holding signs opposing mass killing and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those arrested are elderly citizens; including a former clergyman and the daughter of a World War II genocide survivor.

Global Comparisons

It's not difficult to see where this path leads. In the United States, government officials helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker implied that some were "linked with" other nations, while the current president characterized such protests as anti-Jewish. In doing so, they helped legitimize the authoritarian crackdown on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a conservative administration comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to control dissent. What might a Reform government do with this repressive toolkit? Our forebears struggled, endured hardship and sacrificed their lives to establish our freedoms. We may eventually regret how easily we allowed them to be eroded.